Summary

The modern electric grid is rapidly evolving as large-scale renewable energy resources (RES) such as photovoltaic and wind power are increasingly deployed alongside battery energy storage systems (BESS). These hybrid power plants rely on inverter‑based resources (IBRs), which interface with the grid through power electronic converters rather than synchronous machines. Because IBRs lack inherent inertia and depend on fast-switching semiconductor controls, their behavior during disturbances is fundamentally different from traditional generators. Grid-following (GFL) inverters historically synchronized to the grid and delivered fixed power unless abnormal grid conditions prompted disconnection. The emergence of gridforming (GFM) control has shifted this paradigm by enabling inverters to emulate the voltage– frequency support characteristics of synchronous machines. IEEE Std. 2800‑2022 formalizes performance requirements for transmission‑connected IBRs, mandating capabilities such as reactive current injection proportional to positive‑sequence voltage sags and controlled negative-sequence current injection during unbalanced faults. However, the standard leaves flexibility regarding active power behavior during faults and prioritization between positive and negative sequence currents, resulting in manufacturer‑specific implementation strategies that may affect system dynamics.

This study evaluates how GFM inverters operating in the virtual synchronous machine (VSM) mode, under IEEE 2800‑2022 constraints, influence stability, fault ride‑through (FRT) behavior, and post‑contingency recovery. The work also examines the impact of various negative-sequence current injection schemes and, which are essential for stable decoupled control under unbalanced or harmonic‑rich conditions. From a protection perspective, the paper assesses how IEEE‑compliant IBR behavior affects traditional distance and directional, particularly when inverters hit current limits and alter expected fault current signatures.

Simulation results demonstrate several challenges for legacy protection in IBR‑dominated grids and highlight the need for adaptive or inverter‑aware schemes. The analysis is conducted on a

Simulink test system which consists of a controllable single‑inverter infinite‑bus model for studying grid strength.

Additional informations

Publication type Session Materials
Reference B5_10866_2026
Publication year
Publisher CIGRE
Country United States of America
Study committees
File size 1 MB
Price for non member 30 €
Price for member 30 €

Authors

KAR Jishnudeep - Hitachi Energy Research, United States of America; NUQUI Reynaldo - Hitachi Energy Research, United States of America

Keywords

Distance Protection - Directional Protection - Grid-Forming - IBR - IEEE 2800-2022

Impact of IEEE 2800-2022 Fault-Ride Through Requirements on the Protection of Network Dominated by IBRs