Summary
The increasing integration of inverter-based renewable resources (IBRs) poses new challenges to secure and reliable grid operation. One of these challenges is various oscillations of different frequency ranges. Due to the retirement of conventional synchronous generators (SGs) and the corresponding Power System Stabilizers (PSSs), the bulk power system is losing its capability to stabilize these oscillations. Moreover, the location of the remaining SGs may render them insufficient to provide damping control. As a result, a growing number of oscillation events have been observed in large-scale power grids around the world. For instance, in the December 3rd 2017 event, the Continental Europe synchronous area system was operating under an unusual low-loading condition, and two consecutive generation disconnections due to market operation excited a sustained 0.293 Hz oscillation, which lasted for more than 10 minutes.
Read more Read lessMeanwhile, inverter control technologies have also advanced in recent years, one of which is grid-forming (GFM) inverter control. Although there is no universal definition of GFM, it refers to a suite of control strategies that maintain a constant or nearly constant internal voltage phasor in transient and/or sub-transient time frame to allow fast response to grid disturbance, black start, islanding operation, etc.
This paper investigates the potential damping control contribution from GFM inverters. The two-area four-machine system is used for the study. Three different GFM control designs:
droop, virtual synchronous generator (VSG), and dispatchable virtual oscillator (dVOC) are studied. It is concluded that with appropriate parameterization the three control designs have similar performance and can improve the damping ratio of the target oscillation mode. A sensitivity analysis with respect to frequency droop and voltage droop is performed. Larger frequency droop gain can improve the damping control performance for all three GFM control designs, while larger voltage droop gain has negligible impact on the damping control performance for the three GFM control designs. Additionally, the damping control performance of GFM inverters is compared with grid-following (GFL) inverters with a supplemental power oscillation damper (POD). The GFL inverters without a POD have no damping control contribution. With fine-tuned control parameters, the POD on GFL inverters can modulate active power or reactive power to provide similar damping control with GFM inverters.
A similar study is also conducted on the Continental Europe synchronous area system with the replicated December 3rd 2017 event by simulations. Six substation locations are selected with projected IBR plants. An aggregated GFM inverter model with corresponding capacity is used for each plant and is directly connected to each high-voltage bus. The conclusions are similar with those in the previous study on the two-area four-machine system, except that larger voltage droop gain can also improve damping control when the system is marginally small-signal stable.
Moreover, a sensitivity analysis of oscillation damping with respect to number, capacity and location of GFM inverters is conducted. More GFM inverters and larger GFM capacity can both improve damping control performance, while the GFM controllability depends on the substation location.
Additional informations
| Publication type | Session Materials |
|---|---|
| Reference | C4_10162_2026 |
| Publication year | |
| Publisher | CIGRE |
| Country | United States of America |
| Study committees |
|
| File size | 2 MB |
| Price for non member | 30 € |
| Price for member | 30 € |
Authors
ZHU Lin - Electric Power Research Institute, United States of America; PAZ Benjamin - Electric Power Research Institute, United States of America; RAMASUBRAMANIAN Deepak - Electric Power Research Institute, United States of America; FARANTATOS Evangelos - Electric Power Research Institute, United States of America; GIANNUZZI Georgio - Terna, Italy; PISANI Cosimo - Terna, Italy; COLETTA Guido - Terna, Italy; MICCIONE Giosue - Terna, Italy